home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
090594
/
09059914.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-10-03
|
3KB
|
74 lines
<text id=94TT1184>
<title>
Sep. 05, 1994: Capitol Hill:Evolution: Crime Bill
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Sep. 05, 1994 Ready to Talk Now?:Castro
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
TIME ON CAPITOL HILL, Page 23
Evolution of a Crime Bill
</hdr>
<body>
<p> How major legislation addressing the nation's No. 1 concern
ran the congressional gauntlet--and how your Representative
and Senators voted:
</p>
<p>VOTE 1: APRIL 21--The omnibus crime bill, HR4092, passed the House
of Representatives by a vote of 285 to 141. In addition to $28
billion in spending for programs such as police hiring and training,
prison construction and crime prevention, the bill contained
provisions for an expansion of the death penalty to cover dozens
of federal crimes, a Racial Justice Act that would allow defendants
to use racial statistics to challenge death sentences as discriminatory,
and a ban on the sale or transfer of handguns to juveniles without
parental consent. On May 5 the House separately approved a ban
on the sale of 19 assault weapons by a vote of 216 to 214. The
entire package then went to a conference committee to be reconciled
with the Senate's own omnibus crime bill, which passed in November.
</p>
<p>VOTE 2: AUG. 11--The House voted on a parliamentary rule needed to
bring HR3355, the crime bill as amended in conference, to the
floor for an up-or-down vote. The package differed from the
original bill in several significant ways: its overall price
tag had increased $5 billion, to $33 billion, and it authorized
$5.3 billion more to hire twice as many police officers, but
$4.8 billion less for prison construction; it contained $7.6
billion--$600 million more--for crime prevention and created
a $30.2 billion crime "trust fund" to cover expenses. Ten million
dollars was earmarked for the establishment of a criminal-justice
center at Lamar University in Texas, which falls within the
district of House Judiciary Committee chairman Jack Brooks.
The racial-justice provision was dropped. Passage would have
meant a subsequent vote on the actual bill, but the rule was
defeated, 225 to 210.
</p>
<p>VOTE 3: AUG. 21--After 10 days of wrangling, a new configuration of
HR3355 reached the floor and passed, 235 to 195. Changes from
the defeated version included a shift in about $2 billion from
prevention to enforcement, bringing the total authorization
for police hiring and training to $13.5 billion and for prison
construction to $9.9 billion, while leaving $5.5 billion for
recreational and educational programs designed to steer young
people away from crime. Non-monetary provisions included tougher
penalties for sex offenders and spouse abusers. Funding for
the justice center at Lamar University was deleted. Over all,
the bill was $3.3 billion cheaper than the conference bill defeated
Aug. 11.
</p>
<p>VOTE 4: AUG. 25--Senate Republicans, calling for 13 changes in the
crime package that cleared the House on Aug. 21, forced a procedural
vote to reopen the bill to further amendment. Supporters of
the package, who needed 60 votes to defeat this procedural challenge,
prevailed, 61 to 39 (recorded below), thus clearing the way
for a final up-or-down vote on HR3355. The bill passed, 61 to
38.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>